Benchmarking review of IT function and related enabling capabilities
Tender Overview
About this tender
This Tender is invited by the Issuer. Overview The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet is seeking to engage a consultancy to undertake a benchmarking review of its IT function and related enabling capabilities. Purpose The review will establish an evidence base to support Executive Board consideration of future service priorities, strategic alignment, sustainable operating models, workforce settings and opportunities to improve efficiency, productivity and service delivery. The review should be undertaken in parallel with the broader review of non-ICT corporate and enabling functions, to support a holistic Executive Board view of the Department's IT and non-ICT corporate and enabling services. Objectives Establish an activity-level evidence base Map activities to legislated obligations, critical functions and priorities Benchmark investment, resourcing, service levels and operating models Identify duplication, consolidation opportunities and productivity improvements Where relevant, identify investment and capability uplift opportunities where investment would increase longer term efficiency and sustainability Determine minimum viable and sustainable ICT service levels Develop current and future state options Align with the broader review of non-ICT corporate and enabling functions to support integrated Executive Board consideration of IT and non-ICT corporate and enabling services Scope The scope includes: Workstream 1: Activity Prioritisation Undertaking an activity-level review of functions Mapping activities to obligations Assessing risk of stopping or reducing activities Assessing service impacts Developing a prioritisation framework Workstream 2: Benchmarking and External Comparison Benchmarking ICT and enabling functions against comparable organisations Assessing investment levels, workforce mix, contractor reliance, service levels and operating models Identifying opportunities for consolidation Identifying sustainable ICT service levels and options to reduce contractor dependence Workstream 3: Current and Future State Design Developing a current state assessment Producing service and capability maps Developing future state options Developing operating model recommendations Determining capability requirements Preparing Executive Board-ready recommendations Workstream 4: Workforce and Implementation Planning Assessing workforce profile, contractor usage and capability gaps Assessing workforce transition requirements, implementation dependencies and risks Developing roadmap activities Informing and supporting the in-house developed strategic communications and engagement strategy, as well as change management Deliverables Project initiation pack Data and evidence plan Activity inventory and prioritisation framework Benchmarking methodology Benchmarking analysis Current state assessment Future state options paper Workforce and implementation plan Executive Board pack Final report Outcomes Evidence-based prioritisation of activities Benchmarking against comparable organisations Sustainable ICT operating model recommendations Reduced contractor reliance options Future state operating model options Workforce and implementation plan Executive Board-ready recommendations, which complements the broader review of non-ICT corporate and enabling services and functions
How to respond to this tender
A strong tender response is clear, compliant, and backed by evidence. These steps apply to most Australian and New Zealand public tenders.
Read the requirements in full
Open the official listing and download the full tender pack. Note the response schedules, evaluation criteria, mandatory conditions, and the exact closing time and lodgement method.
Confirm you are eligible and it is worth bidding
Check licences, insurances, certifications, and any conformance requirements before you commit. A quick bid or no-bid decision saves days of wasted effort on a tender you cannot win.
Answer every criterion with evidence
Respond to each evaluation criterion directly and back your claims with concrete examples, referees, and past performance. Address the buyer’s stated need, not a generic capability statement.
Lodge early through the official portal
Submit through the source portal well before the deadline. Late or incorrectly lodged bids are almost always rejected, so leave time for uploads, portal errors, and last-minute questions.
